What the MPC says and what the RBI does

Indian Express, June 22, 2022

Communication is an critical element of monetary policy. In the current inflation targeting (IT) regime, the resolution adopted by the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) and published on the Reserve Bank of India’s website on the day of the monetary policy meeting is an important channel of communication with the public. Yet there seems to be a gap between what the MPC says and what the RBI does.

Under the IT regime, the most important role in communication belongs to the MPC, consisting of three external members, three RBI representatives, and chaired by the Governor. By law, this is the highest monetary policy-making body in the land, tasked with deciding monetary policy changes at regular intervals. These changes are then communicated through formal statements, with the discussions underlying these decisions also being published, so that the public can understand why the MPC decided the way that they did.

During the first few years of IT from 2016 to 2018, the process worked quite well. On the days of policy announcements, the Governor and his deputies would participate in a press conference to answer questions from the media. But otherwise the focus was squarely on the MPC, especially its statement, from which the public used to glean important information about the monetary policy strategy – that is, why the repo rate was or was not changed.

From 2019 onwards, however, things began to change. The RBI began to release a separate Governor’s statement on the day of the monetary policy meeting, presenting an inflation outlook and even explaining the decision taken by the MPC. The rationale for this statement was unclear: at best, it has overlapped with the MPC statement; at times, it has seemed somewhat different, making it difficult for the public to understand what the policy strategy really was.

Consider the MPC statement following the June 8 Monetary Policy Review. The MPC highlighted inflation concerns, and voted in favour of raising the policy repo rate. On the same day, a Governor’s statement issued by the RBI mentioned that the central bank will also remain focussed on orderly completion of the government’s borrowing programme.

The issuance of two such different statements can lead to confusion, especially as lowering inflation and lowering government bond yields are contradictory policy objectives. This is an example of how over the past few years, a communication gap seems to have opened up between what the MPC has been saying and what the RBI has been doing, thereby potentially eroding credibility of the IT framework. This communication gap will need to be closed in order for the RBI to become successful in bringing inflation back to its 4 percent target level.

Why is communication so critical? There are many reasons. But let’s focus on just one, namely the ability of the central bank to influence inflation expectations. If the public believes the central bank is committed to keeping inflation under control, then it will act accordingly. Firms will moderate their price increases, fearing that large price rises will make them uncompetitive. Meanwhile, workers will accept moderate wage increases, while investors will accept low interest rates on their bond purchases. With everyone acting in this way, it will be easier for the central bank to ensure that inflation indeed remains low.

Of course, spikes in commodity prices will inevitably cause inflation to surge from time to time. But if inflation expectations are well anchored, then it becomes relatively easy for the central bank to ensure that inflation returns to the target level before too long.

The most important task of the MPC, enshrined in the RBI Act (Amended), 2016 that introduced IT, is to decide the repo rate, since this has long been the lynchpin of India’s monetary policy framework. Ever since the early 2000s, policy had aimed to keep overnight money market rates in a corridor, with the lower bound established by the reverse repo rate and the upper bound by the repo rate. Since the width of this corridor was fixed, once the repo rate was decided, the reverse repo rate was automatically determined, and market overnight rates adjusted accordingly.

But during the Covid19 pandemic, the RBI constantly adjusted the reverse repo rate even as the MPC kept the repo rate unchanged, meaning that the fixed width of the corridor was lost, and accordingly the MPC lost any role in determining interest rates. Accordingly, the remit of the MPC and indeed the credibility of the entire IT edifice was called into question.

In addition, the RBI introduced a number of new policy instruments, again outside the remit of the MPC. During the pandemic, it brought in the GSAP program through which the RBI precommited to buying a certain amount of dated government bonds in order to control their yields. It then introduced variable reverse repo auctions, and more recently replaced the reverse repo rate with the long-dormant standing deposit facility rate, the rationale for which was not explained in the MPC statement. Unlike developed country central banks like the Bank of England for example, all unconventional monetary policy announcements were kept outside the MPC statement thereby raising questions about the role of the committee in deciding monetary policy actions at a crucial time like the pandemic.

Lastly, the RBI has been intervening in the foreign exchange market to manage the rupee. Forex interventions by definition influence the domestic monetary base and inflation. Yet the MPC in its monetary policy statements does not discuss either the exchange rate dynamics or the forex interventions. Just as it does not discuss the RBI’s interventions in the bond market to lower the yields.

The net result of all these actions is a potential loss of both clarity and credibility. There appears to be an growing rift between what the MPC says and what the RBI does. And with the proliferation of policy instruments, it is no longer clear to the public how the policy stance should be measured – or what the monetary policy framework is.

In its latest two statements, the MPC indicated that policy would now be focusing on bringing India’s inflation rate under control. If the RBI is going to be successful in this endeavour, the first step must be to close the communication gap, by reintroducing a simple and clear policy framework and restoring the central role of the MPC.

Rating RBI’s rate hikes

Times of India, June 9, 2022

On June 8, the Reserve Bank of India increased the policy repo rate by 50 basis points. This is a step in the right direction. There is an ongoing inflation crisis in the country and the central bank seems to have finally woken up from its slumber. This however raises deeper questions about inflation control in India.

This is the second time in the last 15 years that India has faced an inflation crisis and the RBI has been caught napping. The first time was right after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. One big difference between these two episodes is that the RBI is now an inflation targeting central bank. IT was implemented precisely to help avoid a situation of high and volatile inflation. So what went wrong, and what lessons can be learnt from the current crisis?

Let’s first understand how the RBI missed the inflation bus. The inflation problem has been brewing since 2020. During March-Dec 2020, CPI inflation exceeded the 6% upper limit of the RBI’s target band, for three quarters in a row. According to the RBI Act 1934 (amended 2016), this is considered a failure of the RBI to meet the inflation target. The RBI is required to write a report to the Central Government explaining the reasons for the failure, remedial actions to be taken and the estimated time period within which the target will be achieved. At the time however the RBI succeeded in dodging this accountability, citing data problems aggravated by the lockdown. This was also the time when the pandemic was in full swing and central banks all over the world were rolling out easy monetary policies. Hence the analysts and experts (barring a few) in India also did not question the RBI’s overlooking of the inflation problem.

Moving on to more recent times, the Russia-Ukraine war and persistent supply chain bottlenecks have once again pushed CPI inflation above the 6% level starting Jan 2022. More worrisome has been the persistent increase in WPI inflation which has steadily gone up from 10.7% in April 2021 to 15% in April 2022, the highest level in three decades. Wholesale inflation impacts retail prices with a lag. This implies that CPI inflation will continue to increase.

The table below summarises the RBI’s response to this surge in inflation. Even as CPI inflation kept rising and WPI inflation reached alarming levels, the RBI continued to underestimate inflation. It stuck to an accommodative stance and refrained from increasing the policy repo rate. This shows that the RBI did not consider inflation a serious problem till May 2022. Even though no new information surfaced between April and June, the RBI increased interest rates by a steep 90 basis points in a little more than a month, between May 4 and June 8.

This shows that the RBI was behind the curve and is now trying to overcompensate. This does not instill confidence about how inflation is being managed despite RBI being an inflation targeting central bank.

This episode raises deeper questions about the working of the IT framework and highlights some important lessons.

First of all, in the IT regime, the Monetary Policy Committee is responsible for forecasting inflation, setting the policy rate as well as deciding the monetary policy stance to help keep inflation within the target band. We need to ask why did the MPC fail in anticipating the surge in inflation months ahead of time and what reforms are required to help avoid a similar situation going forward.

Secondly, and a related point, it seems the MPC is not using the power that it has been vested with by the law. For instance, a critical feature of an effective committee is dissent by its members. This reflects diversity of opinions, one of the main reasons we have a committee now looking into inflation. It is remarkable that despite the uncertainty of the underlying macro environment, there has not been a single dissent in the MPC as regards the policy rate, for several months. Lack of disagreement raises questions about the MPC’s efficacy.

Third, the greatest contribution that monetary policy can make is inflation control. For this to happen, all other objectives of the RBI must be delegitimised, including, ensuring low-cost borrowing for the government, and exchange rate management.

Finally, a key element of IT is accountability. We need to create an environment where it is costly for the RBI to stray from its primary objective of inflation control. For example, when CPI inflation exceeds 6% for three quarters in a row in 2022, the RBI must explain where it went wrong and what steps are being taken to remedy the situation.

In India, inflation harms the poor the most, and hence it is directly relevant for politicians trying to win elections. In such a situation, the best thing that the RBI can do is to deliver a predictable 4 per cent CPI inflation for decades so that economic policymaking can get back on track and firms and households can start planning for the future. Both the RBI and the government must therefore learn from the current inflation crisis and further strengthen the IT framework so that India does not face a similar episode of high and volatile inflation, the third time around.

Price of wrong price strategy

Times of India, June 2, 2022

India is now facing a dual problem of low growth and high inflation. The recovery has proved much weaker than expected, with growth amounting to a meagre 4.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2021-22. At the same time, inflation has been surging so much so that over the past few weeks the government has taken a wide range of measures to deal with it. Unfortunately, this strategy is misplaced. The government’s actions will have only a marginal effect on inflation, while they may do significant damage to the incipient recovery. The government needs to step back from the inflation fight, and instead encourage the RBI to tighten monetary policy.

CPI (consumer price index) inflation was close to 8 percent in April, nearly double the RBI's legally mandated target of 4 percent. Most of this inflation is caused by supply-side bottlenecks, triggered first by the pandemic and subsequently by the Russia-Ukraine war and lockdowns in China. Yet even as supply has been constrained, the RBI has been pursuing an easy monetary policy, aimed at encouraging demand. As a result, inflation has been increasing.

With inflation surging, and the RBI still in "accommodative" mode, the central government has now announced a slew of measures to ease the supply constraints, focusing on those commodities whose prices have increased sharply. It has banned wheat exports, lowered the excise tax to Rs 8 per litre on petrol and Rs 6 per litre on diesel, and reduced the import duty on steel.

That's not all. The government has also imposed an export duty on steel products at the rate of 15 percent and increased the export duty on iron ore from 30 percent to 50 percent. It has imposed a cap on sugar exports. There is a demand to ban cotton exports as well.

It is clear that the government is trying hard to bring down the cost of commodities. But these actions will only have a modest effect on inflation. Part of the reason is that price increases are no longer confined to just a few commodities. Inflation is now broad-based, extending to virtually every good and service in the economy. Further inflationary pressure is building up, as seen from a WPI (wholesale price index) inflation of 15 percent, the highest in more than two decades. As these wholesale price increases are passed through to the retail level, CPI inflation could rise further.

While the government’s bans and market interventions will do little to dent inflation, they are likely to damage growth by undermining exports and investment. Let’s consider these one by one.

India now faces a historic opportunity to use exports as a lever to boost GDP growth. China, the main export engine of the world, has been locking down its factories even as international firms are scouting for new production locations. Meanwhile, Russia is being subjected to ever-tighter economic sanctions. As a result, two large Asian countries are reducing their presence on the international trade landscape, creating an unprecedented scope for India to attract international firms to produce and export from here.

Exploiting this opportunity requires an appropriate policy stance. Perhaps the single most critical element of such a stance would be a stable and consistent trade policy. Whenever the government suddenly bans exports or imposes export duties, it puts firms with export orders in a position where they cannot fulfil their contracts. This is not only embarrassing, it also exposes both exporters and importers to large losses. To avoid this situation, domestic firms will shy away from entering the export business, while foreign firms will be reluctant to place orders with Indian firms. In addition, multinationals will be discouraged from shifting their production to India. After all, why should a firm relocate here, if there is a risk that its exports could be banned, its imports subjected to high duties, and the rules governing its sector changed overnight?

Similarly, sudden and radical policy announcements discourage investment. After two difficult pandemic years, the economy is now reviving, leading firms to consider whether now is the time to start increasing their production capacity. But firms will start to think again when the government alters policy frameworks overnight, even if the change is in a sector far removed from their own. The cost of major investments can only be recouped over a long payback period, and if over this timeframe the government takes an action that renders their investments uneconomic, the firms could end up in serious financial trouble. So better to play safe and avoid major investments.

Finally, the government's actions will affect growth in yet another way. The reduction in excise taxes on petrol and diesel will deprive the centre of revenue at a time when the budget deficit is already far too large. That means the government may need to compensate by cutting spending on infrastructure projects that are vital for the nation’s development.

At this crucial juncture, macroeconomic policy has the delicate task of simultaneously tackling inflation and promoting the recovery. The first task is the job of the RBI. The central bank must take full responsibility for its actions so far, sending a clear signal that henceforth it will focus on bringing inflation down without getting distracted by any other objective. The government on the other hand needs to focus on growth. It needs to reduce market interventions, eliminate prohibitions, and dismantle trade barriers, so that firms are incentivized to export and invest.

If instead, we continue to get the policy “assignments” mixed up, we will end up with objectives that are mixed up. That is, instead of entrenching growth and derailing inflation, we will derail the recovery and entrench inflation. That would not just be a policy mistake. It would be a recipe for a crisis.